Big Banks Just Printed $42.5 Billion in Profits — So Why Can't They Beat the S&P 500?
By Yogurt · 2026-07-16 · Market Analysis
America's biggest banks just posted a combined $42.5 billion in Q2 2026 profit — a historic number. Goldman Sachs is up 66% vs the S&P's 22%. But most banks can't outrun the index, and the real question is whether any of them are worth owning over a simple index fund.
Earnings Season Kicks Off With a Bang
Earnings season for Q2 2026 officially opened with the financial sector leading the charge. The four largest US commercial banks — JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo — reported results alongside three of Wall Street's biggest investment houses: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and BlackRock. The scoreboard is historic. Combined, the Big 4 banks alone generated $42.5 billion in profit in a single quarter — a figure that would have been unimaginable just a decade ago. By every operational metric, American banking is in extraordinary health. And yet, for long-term investors, the uncomfortable question lingers: does any of this actually help your portfolio?
The Big 4 Banks: $42.5 Billion and a Unified Message
Before diving into individual performance, it's worth appreciating the consensus that emerged from four very different bank CEOs — each with their own focus, clientele, and communication style:
- Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan) — cautiously bullish as always, warning about tectonic shifts, sticky inflation, and elevated asset prices, while acknowledging that the US economy has shown real resilience. This is his trademark: prepare for the worst, run the best business.
- Brian Moynihan (Bank of America) — called it an "exceptional quarter," pointing to a strong deal pipeline and rising investment banking activity. Consumer spending across BofA's massive account base remains healthy.
- Jane Fraser (Citigroup) — declared it Citi's best revenue quarter in a decade, citing double-digit growth as her multi-year turnaround takes hold.
- Charlie Scharf (Wells Fargo) — highlighted that consumer spending is rising and payment delinquencies are falling. Simple message, clean execution.
The common thread across all four: the American consumer is strong, AI investment spending is a genuine tailwind, and inflation — while still elevated — is impacting business less than feared. JPMorgan alone added 500,000 net new checking accounts in the quarter. Bank of America added 160,000. These are not numbers from a struggling economy.
Where the money comes from differs by institution. Commercial banks primarily earn through net interest income — the spread between what they pay depositors and what they charge borrowers. Investment and trading revenues make up the balance, with each bank weighted differently. JPMorgan leads in overall income growth. Wells Fargo trails the pack — its revenue is growing, but at the slowest clip among the four.
The Dilemma: Great Businesses, Disappointing Stocks
Here is where it gets interesting — and a little uncomfortable. Despite world-class management, historic profitability, and a strong economic backdrop, most of these banks have failed to beat the S&P 500 over the past 12 months. That's the test that matters for investors with a long-term horizon: not "is this company profitable?" but "does owning this stock add alpha over just buying the index?"
Let's run the tape:
- JPMorgan Chase: Arguably the best-run bank in history. Stock at all-time highs. And yet, over the past year, it has outperformed the S&P 500 on exactly two days. Two. It's not a bad stock — it's just not beating the benchmark. For traders, there are setups. For long-term buy-and-hold investors, the math is hard to justify.
- Bank of America: The exception in the group. BofA has meaningfully outperformed the S&P 500 over the past year, with rising lows and strong price action. If you were going to own one commercial bank for performance, the chart picks Bank of America.
- Citigroup: The most compelling turnaround story. Jane Fraser is doing serious work rebuilding a bank that peaked at $570/share back in 2007 before the financial crisis sent it into a decade-long spiral. Citi has been the best-performing bank stock in the past year. But resistance levels at $136 and $234 still stand between today's price and any recovery to historical highs. Every technical gain here is meaningful — and hard-fought.
- Wells Fargo: The laggard. Up roughly 12.6% over the past year against the S&P's approximately 22%. Strong consumer business, but the stock simply isn't keeping pace.
The takeaway: even among the best commercial banks in the world, operating a great business and delivering great stock returns are two different things. The S&P 500 remains your toughest benchmark — and for most of the Big 4, it's winning.
Investment Houses: Where the Real Alpha Hides
The story shifts significantly when you move from commercial banks to the investment houses. These firms — BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — operate in a different world: asset management, M&A advisory, trading, IPOs, and wealth management for the ultra-wealthy. Their performance vs. the S&P 500 tells a more interesting tale.
BlackRock: Giant, But Lagging the Index
BlackRock is in a category by itself. Under Larry Fink, it manages $15.3 trillion in assets — an all-time record — after pulling in $868 billion in net new inflows over the past year. Its iShares ETF franchise alone holds over $3 trillion in AUM. The company reported its strongest-ever quarterly results. And yet, over the past year, BLK has returned roughly 6% against the S&P's 22%. You're buying the world's largest asset manager and getting index-underperformance for your trouble.
There are reasons to watch BlackRock closely beyond the near-term chart. The firm is aggressively pivoting into digital assets — tokenizing traditional financial instruments on blockchain infrastructure — and believes this will be a major profit driver as the financial system modernizes. Private markets and alternative investments are also a growing priority. If you believe the next decade of financial infrastructure belongs to tokenization and private markets, BlackRock is positioned to capture it. But for now, the stock isn't rewarding that thesis.
Goldman Sachs: The Clear Standout
Among all seven institutions reviewed, Goldman Sachs stands alone as the one that has convincingly beaten the market. Over the past year, GS is up approximately 66% against the S&P's 22%. That's not a rounding error — it's a three-to-one ratio of outperformance. The chart shows clean breakouts above resistance, rising lows, and the kind of price structure that technical traders dream about.
Goldman's revenue came in at $20 billion for the quarter, with earnings per share of $20 — though the absolute EPS number matters less than the growth rate. The real driver is that Goldman's business mix — investment banking, trading, capital markets, and wealth management — is perfectly positioned for the current environment: rising M&A activity, elevated IPO pipeline, strong trading volumes, and wealthy clients with growing assets. CEO David Solomon runs what is arguably the purest Wall Street machine in existence: advising on every major deal, managing the capital markets plumbing, and capturing the spread on the deals that define modern finance.
Morgan Stanley tells a similar story on the surface — $21 billion in revenue, comparable business mix, and CEO Ted Pick executing a credible turnaround strategy — but there's a crucial difference: Goldman's profitability on nearly the same revenue is significantly higher. Net earnings at Goldman beat Morgan Stanley by roughly a billion dollars despite lower top-line revenue. For investors, this gap in operational efficiency matters. The market hasn't fully differentiated them yet — the two stocks often move as one — but the fundamentals favor Goldman.
The $10 Trillion AI Tailwind They All Agree On
Across all seven financial institutions, one theme emerged with near-universal conviction: AI financing is the biggest investment opportunity of the coming decade. BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley collectively estimate that building out the full AI infrastructure stack — data centers, power, cooling, fiber, compute — will require approximately $10 trillion in capital over the next several years. In 2026 alone, the hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta) are projected to deploy roughly $1 trillion in AI infrastructure capex. Add energy infrastructure, telecom build-outs, semiconductor fabs, and ancillary investments, and the $10 trillion estimate doesn't look like an exaggeration.
For investment banks in particular, this represents a pipeline of advisory fees, debt underwriting, and capital markets work that could sustain elevated revenues for years. M&A is picking up. IPO activity is recovering. Every deal in the AI infrastructure stack gets managed by a Goldman, a Morgan Stanley, or a BlackRock. That's the structural tailwind behind Goldman's breakout — and why the investment banks have outperformed the commercial banks in the current cycle.
The Bottom Line
America's financial sector just posted its most profitable quarter in history. The consumer is resilient, the economy is growing, and AI investment is creating a durable multi-year tailwind for deal-making. No one disputes the fundamental strength of these institutions.
But the critical lesson from this earnings season is this: a great business does not automatically make a great stock. JPMorgan is the best-run commercial bank on earth and barely beats the S&P over 12 months. BlackRock manages more assets than any firm in history and lags the index by 16 percentage points. For most of the Big 4 banks, the honest recommendation is to watch the charts, trade the setups, and not anchor your long-term portfolio to institutions that can't consistently outperform a passive index fund.
The exceptions: Goldman Sachs for active investors who want exposure to Wall Street's deal machine, and Bank of America among commercial banks for those who want a name that has actually outperformed. And underneath it all — the S&P 500 remains the standard you're competing against. As Micha puts it: know when they're rising, and know when to walk away. That's it.